[HTML1] Geoff Green, activist for social justice, a community organizer, and executive director of The Fund for Santa Barbara, joins us to discuss domestic issues and how they are being addressed by The Fund for Santa Barbara and other national community foundations across the US. The Fund for Santa Barbara is activist lead with grant making decisions made by a Board of community members with various socio-economic backgrounds who are active in catalyzing change.
(Photo of Fund for Santa Barbara’s Bread and Roses event generously shared by Kenji Photography.)
The motto of the Fund is “Change not Charity,” focusing work on the root causes of community issues including social equity and access, countering discrimination and working at the policy level in order to make change. In 2011, over $400,000 was awarded to 50 to 75 groups addressing social equity problems. A few of these include the creation of a forum for LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Trans-Gender) youth, programs addressing health access across cultural divides, combating homelessness, access to education for youth leaving incarceration, and reducing youth violence through community planning.
A Social Justice Award was created in 2000 in partnership with the Santa Barbara International Film Festival to highlight the work of documentary film-makers often making films with little financial support. Due to technology improvements and the resulting decrease in cost for cameras, production and editing, the ability to address far-ranging social issues in film has produced numerous, exceptional documentaries. The Fund for Santa Barbara recognizes the importance of film and media to draw greater social attention and involvement in rectifying social “ills.”
Geoff also discusses domestic versus international social investments. Affordable housing, hunger, access to health care and education are just a few of the issues of poverty that draw international attention yet are also very real, domestic issues. Could these problems provide for-profit investment opportunities domestically, and if so, is there clarity about what to do if such projects do not ultimately produce financial returns but do accomplish social goals? How can social goals and financial goals achieve balance? Are there domestic investment opportunities that can make significant social impact and not be a high investment risk?
When looking at social impact, there is also the need to be conscious of mission consistency in investments. For example, if an organization focuses on environmental stability but invests it’s own corpus in oil and products that negatively impact the environment, it is not mission consistent.
These questions and others continue to fuel the discussion of how to best achieve social goals domestically as well as the future of philanthropy vs sustainable investments for social change. Be sure to visit The Fund for Santa Barbara’s website to learn more and get involved. Visit our own Social Impact Marketing Facebook page to enter into discussion about Socially Conscious Investing episodes, and invite others to listen in each week. Thanks for joining us.
Recent Comments