[HTML1] With the impending confirmation of a new justice to the United States Supreme Court, this seems like an ideal time for a primer on the judiciary. It’s easy for Gen Y to be confused about the jurisdiction, practices, and procedures surrounding the highest court in the country.
Our guide for this legal journey is Professor Stephen Wermiel, a Fellow in Law and Government and director of the Summer Institute on Law and Government at American University Washington College of Law.
Professor Stephen Wermiel joins Keeping Up with Gen Y to share with us the steps by which the nine Supreme Court justices decide to hear cases. He also explains why the Supreme Court’s autonomy from voter opinion not only protects us from the tyranny of the majority but also preserves our democracy for future generations.
More about Stephen Wermiel
Professor Stephen Wermiel is a Fellow in Law and Government and director of the Summer Institute on Law and Government at American University Washington College of Law. He teaches constitutional law and seminars on the Supreme Court and on education and the Constitution.
From 1979 to 1991, Professor Wermiel was the Supreme Court correspondent for The Wall Street Journal. Since 1991, he has taught law. For the last five years, he served as administrator of the Marshall-Brennan Constitutional Literacy Project, supervising 45 law students who teach constitutional law in the D.C. public high schools for a year.
He has published law review articles about judicial selection, the federal courts, news coverage of the Supreme Court, and the relationship between the Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th and 9th Circuits. His biography about the legacy of Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr., titled Justice Brennan: Liberal Champion, will be published in October.
He received a law degree from the Washington College of Law in 1982 and has been a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia since 1984. He received his B.A. from Tufts University in 1972.
Recent Comments